When to Use the Subjunctive with Il Paraît Que

The French expression il paraà ®t que  means it seems that and it may require the subjunctive, depending on whether it is used affirmatively, negatively or interrogatively. When used affirmatively, il paraà ®t que  does not need the subjunctive. Example Il paraà ®t quil le fait.It seems that he does it. But when using il paraà ®t que to express doubt or uncertainty, use the subjunctive. Examples Il ne paraà ®t pas quil le fasse.It doesnt seem that he does it (he doesnt seem to do it). Paraà ®t-il quil le fasse ?Does he seem to do it?

Why Alcohol Should Be Illegal - 1319 Words

Savannah Woods Clarkson English Composition 111, Period 1 13 May 2015 Why Alcohol Should be Illegal The legalization of alcohol has been an immense controversy in America since the early twentieth century. Alcohol use can come with dangerous consequences because of the way it can alter the human brain and damage health. I believe that the longevity and quality of life for Americans would greatly improve if the production and sale of alcohol was made illegal. Alcohol consumption causes problems in relationships, car accidents, uses of other drugs, and serious health issues. Typically, alcohol use is abused because people lose self-control the more they consume, and the substance is addictive. According to the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence Incorporation, the use of alcohol causes 2.5 million deaths per year. These deaths come from physical and mental health complications and accidents involving machinery. If alcohol was illegal, millions of lives could be prolonged and even saved annually. The legality of alcohol use and production is not just a current issue; it has been seen as a problem for over a century. In the early 20th century, prohibition leaders were worried about the spread of a drinking culture around the United States. Early Americans saw the negative behavioral changes and wanted to make a change to keep peace and health among Americans. However, there are opposing opinions on this subject. There are many strong believers of maintaining theShow MoreRelatedThe Minimum Drinking Age Act Of 19841219 Words   |  5 PagesLet’s face it; alcohol is an excessively abused drug. Underage parties involving alcohol are increasing in popularity among high school and college-aged students. The drinking age should be lowered to 18 because adults can legally marry, begin a career and support a family, as well as serve in the military and prison. Along with these and many other reasons, the rebellious nature for wanting to participate in illegal activities is an immense driving force for why teens and young adults drink illegallyRead MoreBanning College Students From Consuming Alcohol Before The Age Of Age847 Words   |  4 Pagesstudents from consuming alcohol before the age of twenty-one has a negative effect on the college campus because underage uncontrolled drinking occurs more often. If citizens of the United States are old enough to make life changing decisions for themselves and the country as a whole, why can t they buy an alcoholic drink? The current legal drinking age is twenty-one, but it should be lowered to eighteen and controlled in a safe environment. The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismRead MoreFetal Alcohol Syndrome And The Future Generation877 Words   |  4 PagesFAS better known as Fetal Alcohol Syndrome can be prevented in any case. Women who openly drink alcohol or take drugs while knowing they are pregnant should in fact be found as a criminal. A law was put into effect this previous July in Tennessee stating that in the case you took drugs or drank while pregnant, you will be charged as a criminal and will be thrown into jail. Merrill Miller (2014) wrote the article What Are Mothers to Do? How a New Tennessee Law Criminalizes Pregnancy and Promotes ReligionRead MoreMarijuana Should Not Be Considered as a Lethal Drug973 Words   |  4 PagesMarijuana Should Not be Considered As a Lethal Drug In out society drugs are considered to be addictive and lethal. People tend to abuse drugs regardless of their side effects. In many cases government agencies regulate their use. Also there are drugs that are illegal to use, produce and sale. One of those illegal drugs is marijuana. For thousands of years, marijuana has been used to treat a wide variety of sickness. It became illegal in 1937 under The Marijuana Stamp Tax Act. This act prohibitsRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1231 Words   |  5 Pagesresearch that shows the positive benefits of marijuana, it remains illegal under federal law. In recent years, numerous states have defied federal law and legalized marijuana for both recreational and medicinal use. Arizona has legalized marijuana for medical use, but it still remains illegal to use recreationally. This is absurd, as the evidence gathered over the last few decades strongly supports the notion that it is safer than alcohol, a widely available substance. Marijuana being listed as a ScheduleRead MoreA Broken Class System?. The Misuse Of Drugs Act 1971 Implements1484 Words   |  6 Pagesto users and others. As can be seen below three Class A drugs, Ecstasy, LCD and mushrooms, rank as three of the four drugs which do the least harm. From the above chart, it can be seen that alcohol is, my some margin, the most dangerous drug. Why is it the that alcohol remains legal yet it is still illegal if an adult in the UK decides that they want to take LCD or smoke cannabis they can find themselves with a criminal record and even a prison sentence? Reasons for Reform? Cannabis is the mostRead More Pro Legalization of Marijuana in the United States Essay1689 Words   |  7 Pagesand overall arguments for and against it that many vote seeking politicians and policy makers have put up a strong resistance to this issue. In this paper I will illustrate the reasons why I think marijuana should indeed be legalized and also the arguments from people who disagree and feel that it should stay an illegal drug. Marijuana has been around for centuries. It comes from the species of plant Cannabis Sativa, and is used for things other that its renowned drug form, such as rope, clothingRead MoreDepressants Their Effects1002 Words   |  5 Pagesactivity of a specific part of the body. There are many different types of depressants ranging from sleeping medications to laughing gas, and of course the most common, alcohol. Like all medications, there are the legal and illegal types. Heroin, marijuana, and GHB which is commonly used as a date rape drug, are among the illegal depressants. Ambien and Benadryl are legal depressants when prescribed by a doctor. They are usually prescribed to relieve symptoms of anxiety and insomnia. The effectsRead MoreThe History of Drug Prohibition Essays953 Words   |  4 Pagesthey never give any evidence that any public menace due to drugs actually existed, other than showing that the public demanded drug laws (Trebach 45). This argument is analogous to de fending alcohol Prohibition because if so many people demanded for the eighteenth amendment there must have been an alcohol problem. Indeed, a closer look at the history of drug use shows that, before 1914, most drug users were harmless to society and even carried on normal, productive lives. Troy Duster notesRead MoreLowering The Minimum Drinking Age1380 Words   |  6 Pageswith their friends and drinking beer while watching TV is illegal? Of course, that does not stop them, though. The United States is one of the few countries in which still have such a high minimum drinking age. Although most people think young adults (18-year olds) are irresponsible, the minimum drinking age should be lowered to 18 because they deserve to be recognized as adults in order to avoid illegal, uncontrolled drinking and other illegal actions. According to Alexis Aguirre in The University

Avro Arrow Free Essays

Avro Arrow Since the dawn of mankind, humans have always wanted to conquer the skies. After the Wright Brothers first flight, mankind has dreamed of bigger and better aircrafts. Shortly after World War ll a company named Avro Aircraft Limited was assigned the job by the Royal Canadian Air Force to build supersonic twin engine interceptor which could defend Canada against Soviet Bombers during the Cold War. We will write a custom essay sample on Avro Arrow or any similar topic only for you Order Now With a plant in Milton, Ontario and 14 000 employees, Avro Aircraft Limited built and manufactured ones of the greatest planes in aviation history. The plane was a masterpiece; it flew at nearly mach 2 and had futuristic technologies which would match up to planes from today. The Avro Arrow program turned out to be a huge waste of the effort and money, as it was cancelled less than a year later. There can be many reasons why it was cancelled but the biggest was the immense pressure put on Diefenbaker by President Eisenhower and the United States Air Force. Other reasons could be because of its huge price tag, a new emerging era of anti-aircraft technologies, or the fact that it had many little flaws in its design. Terminating the Avro Arrow program was the right and smarter thing to do by Prime Minister John Diefenbaker and his Conservative Government. The Avro Arrow was a Canadian marvel but came with a huge price tag. The program cost hundreds of millions of more than the estimated price. Originally the Royal Canadian Air Force wanted 40 aircrafts for an estimated $118 million but, the price tag for the interceptor rose from 2 million to 12, and at the same time demand for interceptors fell as the world entered the age of long-range missiles. When Prime Minister John Diefenbaker cancelled the program the price tag stood at $247 million for the aircraft and $132 million for the Iroquois engines. A total cost of $374 million for a bunch of scrap metal. Clearly the project wasn’t worth as much as they were spending. The company’s estimations were way off and the project turned out to cost one-eighteenth of the total national budget, which was money that the government didn’t have to spare and could have used for cheaper alternative defensive mechanisms. In the mid 50’s the world was entering a new era of anti-aircraft missile technologies and smarter missiles were being invented. As Canada was busily trying to find buyers for the Avro Arrow, the Americans were also hard at work trying to sell their BOMARC missiles. When Canada tried to sell the Arrow to the Americans, they tried to sell their BOMARC missiles to Canada. Unfortunately, Canada failed to sell the Avro Arrow to any nation. Instead the newly elected Conservatives cancelled the Avro Arrow program and decided to buy $200 million worth of BOMARC missiles. With the purchase of the missiles, the Canadians signed the NORAD (North American Air Defense) agreement which made Canada a partner in command and control when it came to attacks and threats in Canadian/American airspace. Also it gave RCAF a chance to learn and share secret Air Defense information with the USAF. The BOMARC missile had the same range as the Avro Arrows. The difference was that the missiles were much cheaper and were a more feasible option for the Canadian air-force and the government’s budget. The Avro Arrow had flaws in its design which didn’t let it be at one hundred percent. One of the major flaws that the Arrow had was its limited fuel capacity. It could only carry approximately 10 000 lbs of jet fuel, which meant it had very limited range. The range was such a concern that the Royal Canadian Air Force had to build many special airfields in the North because the Air-force was worried that if the Avro Arrow went on a mission, it would be able to return by refueling in the airfields because it wouldn’t have enough fuel to go and comeback on one tank full. The plane also couldn’t pass some RCAF regulations which meant spending millions more just to fix the issues. The major problems were with the avionics and fire-control of the aircrafts. There were some minor incidences as well, during flight testing the landing gears failed during two separate occasions making the RCAF questioning the aircrafts capabilities. A lot of these problems left the Avro Arrow ineffective during many scenarios. Clearly it was smarter to invest in missiles which could get the job done easier and would cost less than half the price of the existing program. Cancelling the Avro Arrow program was a better and more economically stable decision by John Diefenbaker and his government. The program cost way too much money for our nation to afford. The program turned out to be a complete disaster and a huge waste of time and money. With a new era of anti-aircraft technologies emerging, the government found missiles to be much cheaper than interceptors and just as effective. With the BOMARC missiles we also got a bonus by having the Americans as our partnered Allies with whom we could share our defense techniques with. Due to the complications with the designs the Avro Arrow had many problems too expensive to solve with the existing price tag. The government clearly made the right and smarter decision by cancelling the Avro Arrow program. How to cite Avro Arrow, Papers